Tweety Twump has so LITTLE information at his finger tips, within his grasp, it is scary. He gets Middle East advice from an extremist point of view and has no idea how to balance that extreme POV so he goes with it. He doesn't know what he is doing!
"Jordan Says Moving U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem is ‘Red Line’"
by Breitbart Jerusalem6 Jan 2017
http://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/2017/01/06/jordan-says-moving-u-s-embassy-jerusalem-red-line/
"(AP) AMMAN- Jordan’s government spokesman warned on Thursday of “catastrophic” repercussions if President-elect Donald Trump makes good on a campaign promise to move the US Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem.
Such a move could affect relations between the US and regional allies, including Jordan, Information Minister Mohammed Momani told The Associated Press, addressing the issue publicly for the first time.
An embassy move would be a “red line” for Jordan, would “inflame the Islamic and Arab streets” and serve as a “gift to extremists,” he said, adding that Jordan would use all possible political and diplomatic means to try and prevent such a decision."
On "The David Suskind Show" aired 20 NOv 1967 Dr. Fayez Sayegh presented the Arab viewpoint from Kuwait. He expressed hope that Zionists would see that the settlements are little more than a land grab. That Palestinians are human beings. He said, "Israel is a threat to some Arabs, and as all Arabs feel as they are one nation . . . any threat to any Arab . . . As long as Israel is a threat to some Arabs, it is a threat to all Arabs."
"Want a Third Intifada? Go Ahead and Move the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem"
Why Trump’s plan is a terrible idea for Israel, Palestine, and the wider Middle East.
By Hussein IbishHussein Ibish is Senior Resident Scholar at the Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington (AGSIW)
December 22, 2016
"Among the many alarming ways in which President-elect Donald Trump might upend traditional American foreign policy, one of the most immediate and troubling concerns his pledge to move the U.S. Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Other successful presidential candidates, most notably Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, made the same promise, only, once inaugurated, to emulate all of their predecessors by invoking the executive waiver to the 1995 congressional mandate to relocate the embassy.Trump, however, appears less inclined than either of them to back away from the idea. What awaits is a potentially colossal blunder — not just for Palestinians, but for America’s diplomatic reputation and standing, and also for Israel’s national security."
" . . . His [Trump's} ambassador nominee, attorney David Friedman, who has counseled Trump in past bankruptcy proceedings, has a long history of extreme statements."
"Friedman strongly supports aggressive settlement activity and categorically opposes a two-state solution, although, like most such advocates, he carefully avoids outlining what sort of political arrangement, precisely, he would like to see replace it. This is presumably because this vision constitutes something unspeakable in polite diplomacy — a permanent apartheid system complete with “self-ruling” Palestinian Bantustans in a de facto greater Israel that controls most of the land of the occupied territories without taking responsibility for most of its population. All of Friedman’s public statements express a position of maximal Jewish nationalism (he always uses the word “we” to describe Jewish Israelis), with virtually no concessions to Palestinian human or national rights or international laws or norms of conduct."
Be aware! Beware!
