Tweety Twump says we cannot defeat an enemy that we do not call by a certain term. This is the guy who also says he can commit murder and he would still win the election. Actions speak louder than words folks. So what do you expect Tweety to do as President?
"The silly, distracting debate over whether to use the words ‘radical Islam’"
By Paul Waldman The Plum Line opinion
November 15, 2015
"Republicans have been making this criticism of Barack Obama for years, endlessly saying, “How can he defeat radical Islam if he won’t call it by its name?!?” Even for them, this is an uncommonly stupid argument. Let’s say Obama or Clinton came out tomorrow and said, “Hey, you know what? You guys are right. We are at war with radical Islam.” Then what? Would that make anyone any safer?"
Paul's article is necessary. He wrote it for fools who never fight, or for idiots who make silly arguments as they fight.
Words and terminology will not defeat ISIS, and if I don't use "radical Islam" I can still shoot an ISIS.
By the way, Gen (ret) Flynn says ISIS is a philosophy, a way of believing, rather than a religion. He also said Islam is not a religion, so 1.2 billion people who believe in their faith, called "Islam,' and are Muslims, are out of luck with their faith. But Flynn's words are empty words of a Christian who has no capacity to see other religions exist anyway, so his opinion is moot. Flynn can say ISIS is a philosophy, but it doesn't matter really. In the end, they could be called Kamikaze and the result is the same, suicide bombers.
So get over it, folks who want this terminology battle to continue. We have bigger fish to fry. We have to irradiate ISIS while you call them names . . .
Member "sticks and stones . . . .?
Member a rose by any other name . . . ?
Be aware! Beware!
