Tweety is an absolute fool to think any true American will confuse his version f "fake news media" as listed here are fake in any way with reality or truth. Tweety is the fake, not the news.
Just look at videos of Tweety and determine if you really agree with this tweet!
No reasonable President will ever want to rid America of the free press, and no American would survive it if they did.
The media is not fake, Tweety Twump is fake! Donald Trump is a FAKE PRESIDENT.
I know I say I want to be NON-ideological, and I try, really try to see Tweety's side of his efforts, and his tweets. BUT any President that attacks the First Amendment is not a President. A President that attacks the First Amendment is a traitor to the UNITED States of America.
Free Speech is not free. Americans better ensure it is not infringed by Tweety.
"No, Trump Won’t Change the First Amendment, But It Matters That People Want To"
Government censorship always wears the mask of ‘public interest,’ and this will be no different.
Scott Shackford|May. 1, 2017 1:50 pm
http://reason.com/blog/2017/05/01/no-trump-wont-change-the-first-amendment
"President Donald Trump's willingness to alter the terms of the First Amendment as part of his desire to censor critical press of him is firmly established: See his constant complaints of "fake news" (to be fair, his complaints are sometimes correct) and his desire to "open up libel laws." The president has no direct influence over the content of libel laws because they're state-level laws. There are many pivotal Supreme Court rulings on the relationship between libel laws and the First Amendment protections of free speech and a free press. Trump would have to rewrite the First Amendment in order to get what he wants."
What kind of President wants to lessen libel laws and attack the First Amendment rights of the media? A bad one. The First Amendment is America. Nothing less. To attack the 1st is UNAMERICAN.
It is unequivocally UNAMERICAN to even speak to weaken the First Amendment, much les even suggest it.
"Americans have a remarkable facility for looking for exceptions to the First Amendment and deciding that some controversial or unpleasant statements simply are not valid forms of speech. On the other side of the aisle, there's a concerted push to invalidate the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision by attempting to amend the Constitution to deprive corporations of legal personhood and of their right to free speech."
More . . .
"And we more prominently have the current push to insist that "hate speech" does not qualify as "free speech" and the belief by many poorly educated Americans (some of whom are actual politicians who should know better). These comments by Priebus should be reminders that if and when there are restrictions placed on the free speech of American citizens, it's the leaders of government who will be calling the shots. We have a president who is thin-skinned and self-interested. We also have any number of political operatives who are willing to play along with him in order to maintain power."
