UN Ambassador Nikki Haley, never killed a man, yet apparently tells United Nations USA is ready to go to war if necessary? How about Nikki? Is she ready to carry a gun to the battle too? I bet not.
What are the criteria? If America feels like killing a few million South AND North Koreans, at few hundred thousand at a minimum?
Is America so cowardly, so arrogant, so STUPID as to try to bully the world?
"U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley Threatens World War III."
On June 27, 2017June 27, 2017 By Jerry Alatalo
"Was it only “coincidence” that U.S. President Donald Trump’s spokesman Sean Spicer announced the administration’s discovery of a potential chemical attack by Syria’s Bashar Al Assad, just hours after Seymour Hersh’s devastating-to-Trump article (now internet viral) was published in Germany? Those with any significant knowledge of the Syrian conflict and confidence in their own intuition will answer that question:
“No, it was not by coincidence.”"
More. This is scary and sad information.
"Mr. Hersh’s article points out that Donald Trump was aware his intelligence and military experts did not have irrefutable proof/evidence that Syrian military officers on orders of Bashar Al Assad intentionally dropped a chemical bomb on its own people in early April. Without evidence, why did Donald Trump order 59 Tomahawk missiles launched into the sovereign nation of Syria – and why did he, Ms. Haley and so many others assert they “held the evidence” without eventually making it public?
Ms. Haley told reporters shortly after the early April chemical event that the administration possessed “the evidence”, that it was classified, and that it was a matter of days before it would become declassified then available for all to see. The “evidence” after nearly three months has never been declassified nor published – according to Mr. Hersh’s article because it never existed in the first place."
Tweety's Administration sends mixed, confusing messages that can lead to accidental WAR!
"UN Ambassador Nikki Haley: US will not strike North Korea unless it gives us a reason"
Sara Gonzales Apr 24, 2017 10:51
"
Co-host Matt Lauer asked Haley about Kim Jong Un’s instability and how that would play into the conflict.
“When you have someone as unstable, seemingly, as Kim Jong Un, do you worry that words might force him into a catastrophic mistake?” Lauer asked Haley.
“No, and I think if you look at what is happening now, if there’s a catastrophic mistake, it’s going to be because he’s just continuing to try and instigate an issue,” Haley answered. “It’s the reason why none of us are trying to pick a fight with him. What I can tell you is that the international community right now is very united.”"
You can tell me anything you dream up Nikki, but YOU ARE WRONG! The World is not united behind the USA initiative to start a war and kill people in North and South Korea, not to mention China and Japan!
The "international community" does not want more USA bombing of another country!
